Los Angeles keeps building landmarks — then forgetting the maintenance plan

Another ambitious Los Angeles public project, another question we should have answered before the ribbon gets cut: who is actually going to maintain it?
The new Sixth Street PARC is supposed to be a major payoff from the rebuilding of the Sixth Street Viaduct — 12 acres of new park space stretching between Boyle Heights and the Arts District, with soccer fields, walking paths, playgrounds, dog areas, skate elements, an amphitheater, restrooms, green space and room for community programming.
It is also an $82 million public investment. And according to a new FOX 11 report, neighbors are already looking through the construction fencing and seeing graffiti, dark areas and the same warning signs that have followed the bridge since it opened.
That is the issue for us. Los Angeles is very good at announcing the next big thing. We are much less convinced by what happens after the photographers leave.
Discover More
An $82 Million Park Needs an Operations Plan
Beautiful public space only stays beautiful when maintenance, security, programming and accountability are funded after opening day.
Some links may be affiliate links. INYIM may earn from qualifying purchases.
The park is not even open yet and neighbors are already worried
FOX 11’s Matthew Seedorff got an early look at the park while construction is still underway. The city has not announced a firm opening date, although the Bureau of Engineering expects construction to be completed before the end of 2026.
Neighbors interviewed in the report raised concerns about graffiti, crime, lighting and the possibility of encampments forming once construction fencing comes down. One resident told FOX 11 she does not want to see the new park repeat problems associated with MacArthur Park.

A petition led by nearby resident Tom Trafelet is calling for a Los Angeles Municipal Code 41.18 no-camping zone around the park. Organizers told FOX 11 the petition has already collected hundreds of signatures.
The debate over 41.18 is bigger than this one park, and reasonable people can disagree over whether no-camping zones solve anything beyond relocation. But the neighbors’ underlying question is completely fair: if taxpayers are spending $82 million on a public park, what is the concrete plan to keep it safe, usable and maintained from day one?
We already watched the Sixth Street Bridge go from celebration to damage
This is where the history above the park matters.
When the rebuilt Sixth Street Viaduct opened in July 2022, the nearly $588 million bridge was promoted as a new Los Angeles landmark — the so-called “Ribbon of Light,” reconnecting Boyle Heights and the Arts District with one of the largest bridge projects in city history.
We remember looking at those sweeping arches when the plans were first unveiled and immediately thinking the same thing plenty of Angelenos eventually discovered: people are going to climb those. The design was visually spectacular, but some of the behavior it invited was hardly impossible to predict.
Watch Los Angeles Celebrate the Sixth Street Viaduct Opening in 2022
The opening-day footage captures the original optimism surrounding the new bridge before years of street takeovers, graffiti, vandalism and infrastructure theft became part of its story.
The contrast is exactly why the current park debate deserves attention now instead of two years after opening.
Within days of the bridge opening, street takeovers, burnouts, crashes, climbers and graffiti were already part of the conversation. More recently, repeated copper-wire theft has left portions of the bridge lighting system dark. FOX 11 reported in 2025 that thieves had ripped wiring from electrical boxes, and the newest report shows neighbors are worried those existing problems could simply spill downward into the park.

We have seen this Los Angeles maintenance problem before
This is not an argument against building parks. Quite the opposite. Boyle Heights and the Arts District deserve substantial, well-designed public space. A city should invest in soccer fields, playgrounds, dog parks, arts programming, walking paths and places where people can exist without having to buy something.
But construction money and stewardship are not the same thing.
INYIM has already raised a similar question around Destination Crenshaw and its roughly $100 million public investment: Los Angeles can create an enormous vision, spend enormous amounts of money bringing it to life, and then somehow allow basic maintenance, security and accountability to become the community’s problem afterward.
That cannot keep being the operating model.

The city says cameras, maintenance and programming are part of the plan
To its credit, the city is not saying nothing will be done.
The Bureau of Engineering told FOX 11 that once the park opens, LAPD is expected to live-monitor security cameras. Recreation and Parks will be responsible for maintenance, while graffiti removal will involve Recreation and Parks and the Office of Community Beautification.
Councilmember Ysabel Jurado says her office is working with city departments and community partners on a formal agreement spelling out responsibility for security, maintenance, programming and daily operations. She has also supported creating a park advisory board so surrounding residents and park users have an ongoing voice.
That is the right language. Now comes the part Los Angeles too often struggles with: doing it consistently after the opening ceremony.
The community absolutely has to stay involved. But residents should be partners in protecting a public investment — not unpaid replacements for the agencies already funded to operate it.
And that responsibility cuts both ways. Wherever you live, upkeep starts at your own curb. If you cannot pick up the trash in front of your home, sweep the sidewalk, report damage or take basic pride in the street you actually use every day, then why expect some distant department to care more than the people who live there?
That does not let City Hall off the hook. Public agencies still have to maintain what taxpayers paid for. But a healthy neighborhood cannot run on government alone any more than it can run on residents alone. The city has to show up, and so do we.
Watch FOX 11’s Report on Safety Concerns at the $82 Million Sixth Street PARC
Matthew Seedorff reports on graffiti, lighting, neighborhood concerns, the proposed 41.18 zone and the city’s security and maintenance plans before the park opens.
Sources: FOX 11 Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering.




